A Critique of the Lin Article Essay

Lin, Mack, Enright, and Baskin (2004) state that prior to the writing of this word ira and think emotions have already been associated as triggers in spite of appearance the realm of substance abuse. As g everywherenment durationncy of illustration the authors cite the Project receive 12-step facilitation therapy manual which states that Anger and offense argon pivotal emotions for most recovering alcoholics (Nowinski, Baker, & Carroll, as found in Lin et al, 2004, p. 1114). The traditional sanative method of choice at heart discussion settings has been that of evoke oversight.The focus of this form of handling is in establishing surface level header mechanisms by attempting to teach patients to more effectively manage or express ira rather than actually decrease their fury (Dakken et al, 1995 as found in Lin et al, 2004 p. 1114). The authors feed that there is insufficient documentation relate to the efficacy of this approach. An alternative approach has been crea te by a number of researchers prenomen Forgiveness Therapy (FT).FT states that opus yellow bile, resentment and former(a) accompanying think emotions ar correct responses to severe violations, harmful results atomic number 18 attributed to the same on a occasional basis. The cure goal, therefore, is in assisting the client in working towards educating the client regarding healthy tenderness as a choice. The authors advise that squargon-shouldered results have been found when FT has been employ to certain populations and has been shown to decrease the frequency and unkindness of anger, anxiety and depression rather than apparently improving individuals ability to cope with these emotions (Lin et al, 2004, p. 115). Lin et al, (2004) chose give birth for the validity of FT by donationing the shot that inpatient clients for substance abuse sermon who received FT would demonstrate little anger, depression, anxiety, and vulnerability to substance abuse than sympathet ic clients who received traditional anger management treatment. Subjects were randomly chosen in spite of appearance a treatment center to receive either FT or Alcohol and medicine Counseling (ADC) treatment from a convention of suggested participants. All were diagnosed as substance abusers. for each star participated in four instruments The EFI, which is a sixty item self-importance-report measure of self forgiveness, the BD1-11, which measures symptoms connect to depression, the CSE1 which evaluates attitudes towards self, and STAI which assesses anxiety. each(prenominal) participant in addition became knobbed in a 12 week program, either inwardly the FT mapping or the ADC procedure. The ending result support the original theory for the researchers in that the FT group demonstrated signifi sterntly great im stand upment from pretest to posttest (Lin et al, 2004, p. 117), as whole roughly as a marked difference in retention of improvements between the two therape utic groups after four weeks apart from the therapy sessions. The authors did present five cautions. The first was the lack of macrocosm able to generalize the findings of the nurture cod to the size of the testing. The second is the degree to which resentments are the norm indoors clients treatment histories.The third caution is colligate to the need for the client to persevere within the therapy due to the length and depth of the therapy involved. The stern caution is tie in to providing time for deliver the goods up data beyond the sign four month time piece which was provided for the purposes of this carry. The fifth caution is that there whitethorn have possibly been some unforeseen effects by the therapist involved within the experiment since but one therapist conducted therapy for two groups.The authors summarize their findings by stating that chemical dependency issues whitethorn be linked to or are a result of unresolved negative mad issues such as anger and resentment, and that proximo study of comparing and contrasting FT with more traditional anger management may continue to reinforce the reward of therapeutically engaging in nail down issues rather than simply reinforcing traditional anger management daily coping methods. happenup of the Title From this researchers perspective the overall title is effective and eliminate.It is sufficiently particularized while remaining correctly concise. The wording provides a descriptive picture of the contents of the clause while remaining under twenty words. The title withal properly identifies the caseful of participants in the study, as wellhead as the variables which are analyzed. The authors remain cleared of utilizing buzzword and acronyms which might be unknown to the grapheme (Pyrczak, 2008, p. 20). Pyrczak advises that it is normally unwise for the title of an name to weaken the results of the study (Pyrczak, 2008, p. 16).The authors of this article prove to be careful to not reveal the ultimate findings, while still causation interest by the use of their description. It is clear that the authors of this article took careful consideration in the formatting of this preliminary descriptor. refresh of the abbreviation Overall this slip is effective and appropriate. It clear presents the purpose of the article in a clear and concise manner. The authors reveal the foundational underpinnings, the resulting hypothesis as well as the study group utilized for the overall experimentation.Highlights of the study are provided in the form of mentioning a general overview of the Forgiveness Therapy as well as indicating a favorable way out linked to the hypothesis. The abstract did not rick encumbered with titles of specific measures, except to bear witness that there was a 12 week time frame of counseling sessions. temporary hookup not giving specific statistics, the abstract was clear in concluding that not just were the results of this research po sitive, but that the authors matte up confident to advise that this study substantiated the economic consumption of FT as a viable alternative for residential drug treatment. criticism of the Literature Review Overall, the literature review article portion of this article is appropriate as well as informative. The purpose of the article along with the stated hypothesis logically flows from the abstract. For example, while reading the article the specific problem sphere which the authors are addressing is set within the first paragraph, and this topic of veneration is carried throughout the course of the article.Not unaccompanied do the authors identify the problem area, that of levels of anger and violence observed among alcohol and other substance abusers (Lin et al, 2004, p. 114) but they also stress the gravity of the situation by providing specifics regarding the correlational statistics between said negative emotions and the softness of addicts to remain sober. Thi s provides the reasoning behind wherefore greater development in this area within therapy needs to be addressed. In so doing the authors were also careful to properly cite sources for circumstanceual statements which reinforced their supposition. In so doing, they were careful to not submerse the article with an over abundance of cited material, passing sufficient room for their own findings. eon drawing out the concerns related to the anger and resentment issues at hand, the authors provide a well developed summary of both the Forgiveness Therapy model as well as the Anger Management Modules. The authors also provided clear and concise definitions of the instruments utilized within the study as well as providing well illustrated table in cooperation with the results of the study, and how those results can be interpreted with each instrument, and how they tally with each other.For example not only does the article provide a division List for each group, (Lin et al, 2004, p. 111 7 Table 1) it also provides a significant breakdown of the path and Standard Deviation for Dependent Variables related to both study groups (Lin, Table 2, p. 1118). The only area in which this researcher may see the Literature Review as somewhat weak is in the fact that the latest research which is available within the article is from the year 2004, due to the age of the article in question. That being said, however, over all this is a well crafted review.Critique of Research Questions The hypothesis stated in this article leaves no room for skeptical what it specifically entails. After providing a lucubrate foundation of why FT is a viable alternative in various(a) counseling arenas as opposed to ADC, the authors then intelligibly state that they hypothesized that individuals in residential treatment for alcohol and drug habituation after receiving treatment augmented by FT, would demonstrate less anger, depression, anxiety and vulnerability to substance use and more self es teem than those receiving ADC treatment. Lin et al, 2004, p. 1115). This hypothesis clearly provides not only a reference and a background of a therapy it also provides specific measurable goals, and goals which can be contrasted by other measurable goals, within and on behalf of a specific demographic.Each of the specific parts of the hypothesis are logically developed within the literature review, and the developed research proves to be appropriate for the investigation at hand, albeit with specific concerns related to limitations which naturally apply due to the circumscribed nature of the study in regards to tally of participants, limited amount of time for follow up study for the initial research, and some concern over possible biases native due to the fact that one therapist facilitated both study groups.